What’s the Office Good For, Anyway - office vs hybrid work

What’s the Office Good For, Anyway? – 2024 Guide

Hybrid workers aren’t against the office environment itself, but rather the journey to get there. Research indicates that the daily commute for many is both time-consuming and expensive. In addition, scholarly investigations have established connections between extended commuting and diminished job satisfaction, heightened stress, and deteriorated mental well-being.

In the context of these findings, when I guide organizations in structuring hybrid work models for their teams, the focal point becomes the reduction of commuting time. This involves employing empirical methods to pinpoint tasks that yield the most valuable return for physical office presence.

Subsequently, we formulate a messaging approach to articulate the significance of these in-person tasks, ensuring that hybrid employees comprehend the importance of being present for these high-impact assignments.

Furthermore, we communicate a pledge to lessen their commuting burden by strategically grouping activities that necessitate in-person interaction, enhancing retention, engagement, and morale while alleviating burnout.

Page Contents

What Office Tasks are Suited for Hybrid Employees?

Office Tasks are Suited for Hybrid Employees

Source: kumospace.com

Most of a hybrid employee’s hours are consumed by solitary work, such as concentrated tasks, asynchronous communication, collaboration, and virtual meetings—all best performed at home. The office, however, remains indispensable for high-impact, short-duration activities that thrive on face-to-face engagement.

This includes in-person gatherings to resolve issues, make choices, align strategies, design plans, and forge agreement on remotely brainstormed ideas. Physical presence permits teammates to discern subtle cues like facial expressions and body language, adding depth to the collaboration.

Moreover, being together in person fosters empathy, reinforcing trust and connection within the team. The office environment, equipped with whiteboards and other tools, further bolsters this collaborative mindset, allowing employees to transition into a more creative and cooperative mental state.

Complex Discussions

Conversations with emotional or contentious undertones are best managed in person. This includes performance evaluations, conflict resolutions, and human resource issues. My clients have discovered that face-to-face discussions often resolve the majority of disputes.

Enhancing Team Unity and Company Culture

Enhancing Team Unity and Company Culture with in office workers

Source: timeular.com

In-person interactions cultivate deeper trust and a sense of belonging, transcending what virtual calls can achieve. Activities such as socializing or strategic planning in a physical setting foster group cohesion and strategic alignment, unlike virtual gatherings.

Comprehensive Training

Although online learning can be sufficient, face-to-face interactions are paramount for profound training. In-person sessions enable trainers to gauge and respond to attendees’ reactions, fostering a supportive learning community. The physical environment also enhances engagement with the material.

Mentoring, Leadership Growth, and Practical Training

Mentoring, Leadership Growth, and Practical Training in office

Source: monkeypuzzletraining.co.uk

The office environment enriches professional development. Supervisors can observe and provide immediate feedback, something challenging in remote settings. Additionally, the in-person interaction facilitates nuanced mentoring and leadership growth, nurturing trust and vulnerability.

Unplanned Interactions and Fragile Connections

Remote or hybrid work models can diminish weak relationships across different functions within a company. Casual in-person interactions, like those in a cafeteria or following a meeting, foster these connections, sometimes sparking innovative ideas. The office environment naturally supports such serendipitous interactions.


Optimal hybrid work practices reduce commuting by requiring physical presence only for significant face-to-face tasks. These include intensive teamwork, complex discussions, team unity, professional growth, mentoring, and fostering weak connections.

For most employees, these activities might necessitate a day a week in the office, although more recent hires and newly promoted leaders may require two or three days initially. Leaders must also craft transparent communication policies to clarify this approach, soliciting employee feedback to refine it. This fosters buy-in and engagement, boosting retention, morale, and productivity while mitigating burnout.

If you need help designing an office, worry not because our article got you covered!